PeripheralPDP-Laban backs UST alumnus for House speaker Thomasian lawyer Lord Allan Velasco was chosen by the Partido Demokratiko Pilipino – Lakas ng Bayan (PDP-LABAN), President Rodrigo Duterte’s political party, as their bet for the next House speaker. Published 1 year ago on June 26, 2019By Paolo Alejandrino Photo taken from Philippine Daily Inquirer Share Tweet Thomasian lawyer Lord Allan Velasco was chosen by the Partido Demokratiko Pilipino – Lakas ng Bayan (PDP-LABAN), President Rodrigo Duterte’s political party, as their bet for the next House speaker. In a statement Wednesday, June 26, Senator Manny Pacquiao, a party stalwart, announced the endorsement of Marinduque representative Velasco as their choice for the House speakership.Earlier, majority of the PDP-Laban members signed a manifesto stating their support for Velasco. But later in an interview, Duterte said that he will not be endorsing anyone for the post.The manifesto read: “We are firmly convinced that Representative Lord Allan Jay Q. Velasco is imbued with the leadership qualities to steer and unite the entire House of Representatives in the passage of crucial legislative reforms in support of the legislative agenda of President Rodrigo Roa Duterte in order to safeguard the country’s economic gains and social progress.”Further, the manifesto added that Velasco is “the best choice” in leading the 18th Congress “given his experience, competence and strong camaraderie with his colleagues.”Meanwhile, Duterte, through Malacañang spokesperson Salvador Panelo, reiterated his statement saying that he leaves the position to the capable hands of the members of the Congress. He added: “[Duterte] is comfortable with any of the candidates securing the seat of the Speaker of the House of Representatives because they are all his political allies.”Velasco finished his Bachelor of Laws in the University of Santo Tomas in 2005. Last 2018 in their homecoming, UST Alumni conferred on him Gawad Thomasian Alumni in Government Service Award along with Mocha Uson.He served as the provincial administrator of Marinduque as well as the chairman of the Marinduque chapter of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines.Among his priorities during his term as the provincial tourism council chairman was the improvement in agriculture and eco-tourism. Furthermore, as the Chairman of the House Committee on Energy, he passed an act institutionalizing energy efficiency and conservation programs, while advocating for affordable energy and sufficient power supply.Comments Related Topics:alumniGovernmentHouse of RepresentativesHouse speakerPDP-LabanThomasianustVelasco You may like #Quarantrends: What took over the internet amidst the quarantine Media profs, students decry House ‘murder’ of ABS-CBN UST releases ‘new normal’ FAQs page PeripheralCHR, Church opposes Duterte’s call to revive death penalty The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and the Church slammed President Duterte’s call to revive death penalty for crimes related to illegal drugs in his fifth and penultimate State of the Nation Address. Published 2 weeks ago on July 28, 2020By TomasinoWeb Photo courtesy of Manila BulletinThe Commission on Human Rights (CHR) and the Church slammed President Duterte’s call to revive death penalty for crimes related to illegal drugs in his fifth and penultimate State of the Nation Address. “We believe in the need for a comprehensive approach in addressing drug sale and use, as well as other crimes anchored on restorative justice,” CHR spokesperson Jacqueline de Guia said in a statement. While the commission agrees to punish crimes, de Guia stressed that it should not result in further violations of human rights. Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines – Commission on Prison Pastoral Care chairman and Legazpi bishop Joel Baylon and Balanga bishop Ruperto Santos cited that studies proved that capital punishment does not deter crimes. “The country will also lose the honor of one of the nations which condemned death penalty if capital punishment is revived,” Sorsogon bishop Arturo Bastes said. According to CHR, Duterte’s vow to uphold human rights above all does not coincide with restoring death penalty through lethal injection. The Commission also cited that it would breach the international agreement to abolish capital punishment, which the country ratified in 2007. “[A]ny moves to reinstate capital punishment in the country conflicts with the tenets of the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” de Guia said.Senate President Vicente Sotto III on Monday, July 27, said the revival of death penalty for drug-related offenses now has a better chance of being passed in the 18th Congress. Raheema VelascoComments Continue ReadingPeripheral‘Have we really achieved acceptance?’—gender lawyer Twenty years into the fight for an anti-discrimination legislation, gender equality and human rights lawyers stressed the need for a law that would protect the LGBTQI+ community from sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE) discrimination. Published 1 month ago on June 28, 2020By Jayziel Khim Budino Screengrab from #PrideHangouts 02: Tuloy ang Laban para sa SOGIE Equality webinarTwenty years into the fight for an anti-discrimination legislation, gender equality and human rights lawyers stressed the need for a law that would protect the LGBTQI+ community from sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression (SOGIE) discrimination. “[J]ust last year, Metro Manila Pride recorded 70,000 attendees. For the most part we thought that it’s a sign of society’s increased support for the community…[b]ut have we really achieved acceptance?” Atty. Claire de Leon said yesterday, June 27. The Gretchen Diez incident last year, according to Atty. De Leon, “drastically” shifted the perception of the public toward the LGBTQI+ community and the ongoing fight for the SOGIE Equality bill. Misconceptions surfaced after the incident that was followed by a “massive” misinformation campaign against the bill. “[N]akakalungkot na marami ding nagbabangga ng mga karapatan natin sa karapatan ng ibang sector. Nakakalungkot na ang ibang tao iniisip nila na this bill would take away rights from heterosexuals or cisgender persons,” Atty. De Leon said. However, she stressed that protecting the rights of a marginalized sector does not take away the rights of another.“[I]f you think that allowing a sector to exercise their rights would take away the rights of others, [then] we must rethink how we see rights [and] how we understand rights,” she said. Anti-discrimination ordinances in LGUs The lack of SOGIE-based national laws pushed LGBTQI+ groups to fight for anti-discrimination ordinances (ADO) within the local government units. Marikina Mayor Marcelino Teodoro announced last year, June 29, the passage of the city’s ADO during the Metro Manila Pride March. Quezon City on the other hand passed on November 28, 2014 the Gender Fair Ordinance, which was authored by Councilor Mayen Juico and was signed by the then-mayor Herbert Bautista. Despite having implementing rules and regulations (IRRs) and ordinances, Atty. De Leon said that the process is not entirely implemented and effective. “May council [at] may members of the council pero walang office…[N]a-highlight lang nito na hindi natatapos ang lobbying, hindi natatapos ang laban natin sa pagpasa ng ordinance,” De Leon said. “Kailangan nating ma-push na meron IRRs at also kailangan nating ma-make sure na nai-implement talaga ang mga ordinances na ‘to,” she added. De Leon said that laws and initiatives against anti-discrimination, whether from the national government, LGUs, or private sectors, are necessary to build a more inclusive community.“Discrimination still occurs and as long as discrimination under the basis of SOGIE persists, we need a law that would give us protection…[p]rotection must be available and accessible to each of us regardless of our SOGIE,” she said. SOGIE and Anti-terror billsREAD Militant student group decries death threat on SHS student amid activist crackdownAccording to Atty. Eljay Bernardo, the “vagueness” of the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Bill can directly affect the LGBTQI+ community as a marginalized sector fighting for SOGIE bill. “If we request government, demand government of our rights, it could be construed as terrorism, as destabilization,” Atty. Bernardo said.The imprisonment of the Pride20, according to him, uncovered how the law can be “twisted” against freedom of speech and assembly. Last Friday, June 26, 10 members of LGBTQI+ rights group Bahaghari along with eight from other progressive groups, and two drivers were detained at the Manila Police District. They were being charged with disobedience of persons in authority in relation to Republic Act 11332, or the Law on Reporting of Communicable Disease and Batas Pambansa 880, or the Public Assembly Act.Atty. Bernardo said that the bill could put burden in LGBTQI+ groups, which could be an excuse to put the members of these groups under the surveillance of an anti-terrorism council. According to Atty. De Leon, the Anti-Terror bill could “silence all of us,” especially the marginalized sector. “[F]or us when activism is the only way of asserting our narratives, this can further render us voiceless. It seems like wala naman siyang direct effect, pero the dangers of it ay nararamdaman na natin ngayon,” she said. The webinar #PrideHangouts 02: Tuloy ang Laban para sa SOGIE Equality was hosted by Pat Bringas and was organized by Metro Manila Pride. Comments Continue ReadingPeripheralHuman rights lawyers pan anti-terror bill’s ‘vague’ definition Former Department of Social Welfare and Development secretary Prof. Judy Taguiwalo said that the “new normal” today is somewhat similar to the Marcosian “new society.” Published 2 months ago on June 8, 2020By TomasinoWeb Screengrab from the Martial Law Noon, Terror Bill Ngayon webinarHuman rights lawyer and former Bayan Muna representative Neri Colmenares put emphasis on the vague definitions included in the Anti-Terror Bill in an online forum held Saturday, June 6.These broad definitions, according to Colmenares, could be dangerous, especially that Section 26 requires the formation of an Anti-Terror Council (ATC). “[I]t’s an executive body eh at ang mga members niyan ay mga executive officials, mga bataan ni President Duterte. Puwede kang i-designate na terorista,” he said during the Martial Law Noon, Terror Bill Ngayon webinar.The Section 29 of the bill, as explained by Colmenares, will allow the ATC to “issue a written authorization that allows the police to arrest an alleged suspect” and detain him up to 24 days. “Ang term nila sa batas written authorization, but essentially it’s a warrant. It grants the police the power and the authority to arrest you eh…[H]indi naman judiciary ‘yun,” Colmenares said. Lawyer Tony La Viña believes these provisions to be “unconstitutional” and could go after legitimate movements and actions and be colored or linked to terrorism.“‘Yung terrorist, ‘yun ‘yung nagbobomba, nagpapatay ng walang kahulugan. The violence is simply intended for chaos, simply for destruction of the society. The old definition [in Human Security Act] did not respect that distinction. Mas lalo na ngayon [sa Anti-Terror Bill], “Nagdagdag ng mga crimes tulad ng inciting to terrorism, support of terrorism, proposal to commit terrorism—lahat ‘yan are all acts that we can actually do on a day to day basis sa pakikibaka…[P]uwedeng kulayin at kulayan ng gobyerno at sabihing ‘terrorism ‘yan’ or ‘inciting to terrorism ‘yan,” La Viña said.The judicial authority in the Anti-Terror Bill, according to La Viña, is “much less rigorous” in safeguarding on abuses, rights to privacy in communication, personal security, and unreasonable searches and seizures. The bill will also remove the jurisdiction of the Commission on Human Rights to prosecute human rights-related crimes. READ PRESS RELEASE: Salinggawi Dance Troupe's "DanSci-Fi: A Glimpse Into the Future"Colmenares sees the recent protests against the passage of the bill as “reasonable” despite being in the middle of a pandemic, as it shows the disapproval of many Filipinos to the bill. “[T]andaan natin na sa kasaysayan natin, ang pinakamalaking tagumpay ng sambayanang Pilipino ay nakamit natin sa gitna ng pinakamasidhing krisis. Kaya tama lang ang ginagawa nating paglaban. Resonable ito [upang] maipanaig ang pagtutol ng sambayanang Pilipino na maisabatas itong new Terror Law,” Colmenares said.Marcos’ ‘new society’ now the ‘new normal’Martial law survivors warned the public of the parallelism between the provisions of the Anti-Terror Bill and the abuses during the martial law period in the Philippines. Former Department of Social Welfare and Development secretary Prof. Judy Taguiwalo said that the “new normal” today is somewhat similar to the Marcosian “new society.”“[Sa] new normal makikita natin [ang] mas matinding kawalan ng trabaho, mas matinding kakulangan sa kalusugan, mas hirap sa edukasyon, at milyong mga OFWs ang babalik. So paano ‘yan haharapin?,“[N]andyan na [ang] undeclared martial law…[N]gayon kahit walang kaso hinuhuli, ikinukulong,” Taguiwalo said. Bagong Alyansang Makabayan Chairperson Dr. Karol Araullo said that the bill intends “to silence criticism, critical thinking, and opposition.”“Ayokong tawaging Anti-Terror Bill eh kasi sa totoo lang, it is a bill intended to terrorize the people into submission sa mga patakaran na hindi makabubuti sa kanila,” Araullo said.To avoid the repetition of the 1972 martial law, Araullo said the limitations in the imposition of martial law was included in the 1987 Constitution.“[T]hey want to carry out ‘yung ganyang klaseng panunupil on a wider scale which they are unable to do under the current laws…[S]o inimbento nilang itong Anti-Terror Bill,” she said. John Aaron PangilinanComments Continue ReadingLatestPopularVideos Blogs1 week agoJuly 2020: A great storm of misplaced priorities Features1 week agoWalking in unity for this year’s #SONAgkaisa Opinion2 weeks agoI challenge you to scrutinize Peripheral2 weeks agoCHR, Church opposes Duterte’s call to revive death penalty News2 weeks ago‘Duterte regime falls deaf to people’s cries’ –CSC, LSCs Blogs1 week agoJuly 2020: A great storm of misplaced priorities Features1 week agoWalking in unity for this year’s #SONAgkaisa Videos2 years agoUST UAAP Season 81 Videos2 years agoGraduating Thomasians answer what they will miss in UST Live2 years agoLIVE: Tagisan 2018 Videos3 years agoTraslacion 2018 Videos3 years agoNational Day of Protest Facebook Trending Blogs1 week agoJuly 2020: A great storm of misplaced priorities News3 weeks agoTake part in SONA protest, student council presidents urge Blogs2 weeks agoThe allegory of Alyx Arumpac’s “Aswang” Blogs3 weeks agoHow well do you know your rights?