GlitchMagtanim ay ‘di biro: Rice Liberalization Law backfires “What affects the farmers the most is the all-time low prices of their copra and palay and there is nothing else to be blamed for this but the anti-farmers program Rice Tariffication Law and the perpetual negligence of the government towards the agriculture sector.” Published 7 months ago on December 26, 2019By Coleen Ruth Abiog, John Aaron Pangilinan Farmers and militant groups rallying in front Mendiola Gate in Manila on Oct. 21, 2019 | Jaime Taganas/TomasinoWeb Share Tweet The promise of Rice Liberalization Law (RLL) to aid both the Filipino farmers and consumers falls short as it devastates the palay industry and the livelihood of local rice farmers.Fifty-eight-year old Dominador Abarcar’s outcry are the lack of irrigation in their farming land and the incessant rice imports which continuously strike heavy blows in the price of his palay.“Kasi sa dami ng mga [iniimport na bigas dito], naaapektuhan kami dito kasi nako-kontrol yung price ng palay dito sa amin,” the farmer from San Nicolas, Pangasinan told TomasinoWeb in a phone interview.He said that they were left with no choice but to trade with the buyers in their area from whom they have loans because they needed the money for their livelihood.“The Rice Tariffication Law (RTL) had to be enacted to liberalize the importation of rice with tariff…allowing the Philippines to limit rice imports for a specific period of time in order to give the Philippines enough time to make our rice farmers competitive,” Senator Cynthia Villar, the primary author of RLL, said in a statement sent to TomasinoWeb.“The rice farmers will benefit by reducing their production costs, increasing their farm yields, and ultimately raising incomes,” she said.10-billion pesos, according to Villar, will also be allotted for rice farmers through the creation of Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) under RLL. This includes farm equipment and technology, assistance programs, irrigation projects, and fertilizers.In addition to RCEF, excess to the tariff collected by the Bureau of Customs from rice importers beyond the 10 billion pesos will be distributed to rice farmers in the form of unconditional cash transfer.“[Y]ung sa irrigation wala ho eh. Walang nagpopondo sa amin,” Abarcar said when asked about how the local government acts on their irrigation problems.For him, the adverse effects of RLL which now burden many farmers like him will only be resolved if the entry of imported rice will cease and if the National Food Authority (NFA) will take in charge of the palay trade in the country.“Ang gusto namin sana totoo yung sinasabi ni Rodrigo Duterte na…wala nang papasok na imported na bigas dito sa amin… na hahawakan na ng NFA yung sa magsasaka,” Abarcar said.Farmers from Western Samar have also been lamenting over the same absence of government assistance after the devastation brought by El Niño last year. “Nagpupunta sila doon [sinasabing] tutulungan kaming magsasaka. Tinatanong ko nga isa isa kung ano [ang] ikaaangat ng mahihirap na magsasaka. Ang sinasabi [nila] bibigyang puhunan para maka-angat naman,” farmer Allan Labong said. “[Hanggang] ngayon hindi pa naman ‘yon dumadating.”In an official statement released by Stand with Samar-Leyte Network, Eastern Visayas region was once the primary source of copra and palay but now it has been experiencing a decrease in production since 2013 after the onslaught of supertyphoon Yolanda.“What affects the farmers the most is the all-time low prices of their copra and palay [which] now plummeted at 10 pesos and below [and there] is nothing else to be blamed for this but the anti-farmers program Rice Tariffication Law and the perpetual negligence of the government towards the agriculture sector…” it said.Agricultural crisisResearch group IBON media said that government’s “long-time neglect and chronically low prioritization” of the agriculture sector gave rise to the agriculture crisis.“This is in line with government’s advancement of neoliberal policies favoring local and foreign big business. The Duterte government continues this by giving minimal support to the agriculture sector.” IBON said.Signs that the crisis is worsening, according to IBON, include the declining share in gross domestic product and agricultural productivity per capita, increasing import dependence, rising trade deficit, and widespread rural poverty.“The agriculture sector’s share in the economy has [shrunken] from over 40% in the 1960s to less than 10% in 2018,” they said.Reduction of all forms of loans, according to IBON, including amortization for awarded lands, and substantial increase in support and subsidies for the agriculture and agrarian reform sectors are the immediate steps that should be done by the government to alleviate the agriculture crisis.“It should also suspend, and eventually repeal, policies like the Rice Liberalization Law, that are harming domestic production and farmers’ livelihoods,” they added.“But to truly strengthen domestic agriculture, [the] government needs to implement long-term policies that prioritize rural development over big business interests.”‘Man-made calamity’Civic leaders expressed their resentment and disapproval of the RLL in several interviews with TomasinoWeb during a farmers’ rally in Mendiola last October 2019.For former representative of Anakpawis party-list and chairman of the farmers militant group Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP) Rafael “Ka Paeng” Mariano, the RLL is a “catastrophic man-made calamity” as it destroys the livelihood of farmers and the agriculture sector in which the country’s staple food is sourced.“Talagang salot ‘yan, hindi lamang sa kabuhayan ng ating mga magsasaka—pangunahin ‘yon—kung hindi salot ‘yan sa lokal nating produksiyon ng palay, bigas, at pagkaing butil sa bansa, bilang staple food natin ‘yan,” Mariano said.He also mentioned that the RLL itself violates the constitution: “…Sa 1987 Constitution, malinaw doon na may pertinenteng probisiyon [na] nagtatadhanang ‘the state shall defend the right of a family to a family-living wage and income.’ ‘Di ba labag ‘yon?”“Sa declaration of principle and state policies na nagsasabi yung Section 19: ‘The state shall develop a self-reliant and independent national economy effectively controlled by Filipinos.’ ‘Di ba labag ‘yang pinirmahan ni Duterte na ‘yan?” he added.Rice insufficiencyAccording to IBON, Duterte government has painted a picture that the country can never be rice self-sufficient.“Rice import dependency ratio declined from 9% in 1990 to 5% in 2016. But this rose to 6.6% in 2017 and is expected to be higher due to the influx of rice imports under the Rice Liberalization Law,” they said.Villar stated otherwise: “We are not depending on rice imports. The RCEF will enable the 947 rice producing towns to mechanize by giving them machines at the rate of P5B/year where each town shall be receiving P5M a year for the next six years.”“Filipino rice farmers will become more competitive and the Philippines will become rice sufficient,” she added.Mariano similarly stressed that if the palay industry dwindles amid a subsequent global food crisis, the local food security will be at risk.“Hindi tayo dapat umasa sa pandaigdigang pamilihan kasi kahit may dolyar tayo…kung wala ka namang maangkat na bigas—Traditionally itong mga rice exporting countries malaunan niyan, ‘pag tinamaan din itong climate change, bumaba ang kanilang lokal na rice production, so maghihigpit ‘yan at hindi na rin sila mag-eexport ng kanilang bigas,” he said.IBON maintained that RLL jeopardizes the country’s food security: “The Philippines has now embarked on imports liberalization of its staple – a dangerous path not just for the country’s food security, but more importantly, for that elusive economic development.”NFA’s road to demiseREAD UST Holds 1st Asian Conference on Families Culminating EventAside from the “drought” in support and subsidy for the farmers, Mariano said the “neoliberal economic policies na liberalization, deregulation, privatization” of the RTL will soon lead to the privatization of the NFA.Mariano and Bagong Alyansang Makabayan Secretary-General Renato Reyes expressed the same sentiments that the RLL should be revoked to regulate again the rice import and called for the strengthening of NFA for it to influence palay price.“Ang first thing na kailangan gawin is to reverse the decline dun sa livelihood. So tatanggalin mo yung Rice Tariffication Law [at] i-reregulate mo yung import. Puwede magpasa ng legislation that can strengthen the NFA. Increase its budget and its purchasing [capacity] para sa domestic rice producers,” Reyes said.“Kailangan ng NFA ang 40 billion pesos para at least mabili niya at least yung 10 percent ng total palay production natin sa bansa,” Mariano said.Mariano explained that there should be a “floor price” in the price of rice and palay to avoid too much fluctuation because there is no reason for the price of local rice to increase.“Dahil ang rule of thumb diyan, ‘pag bumili ka ng 20 pesos per kilo ng palay, multiplied by 70 percent—‘yon na yung dagdag na cost to produce one kilo of rice—so 14 pesos. Idadagdag mo lang 14 pesos sa 20 pesos, so dapat presyo ng bigas 34 pesos […] may kita na ang retailers. […] Eh magkano presyo ngayon?…38 pesos to 44. Walang dahilan para tumaas yung presyo ng bigas,” he said.“Kung NFA naman ang bibili no’n, puwede pa rin. Kung well milled rice, binili mo ng locally produced, P20 clean and dry sa magsasaka, so puwede mong ibenta pa rin ng P30 ang release price kung well milled rice, at P25 per kilo kung regular milled rice. May subsidy,” he said. “Yung subsidy na ‘yon ituring na social cost, hindi financial losses para sa NFA,” Mariano said.Mariano also explained that the privatization of the NFA will limit its operations because its buying of palay will be limited only to its buffer stock or the rice consumption good for 15 to 30 days, and will only serve during emergency situations. In addition, only private businesses will sell rice in the country making it difficult to know the total rice inventory of the country.Meanwhile, UST Political Science Department Chairperson Asst. Prof. Dennis Coronacion, Ph.D. said that removing NFA will also remove the regulating mechanism or office in the country’s agricultural sector.“Ang purpose naman kasi ng NFA is to regulate ‘yung market. Probably ‘yung regulation mechanism or office, ‘pag tinanggal mo wala nang magre-regulate. Who else will set the price? You don’t expect the market in setting the price or prices to think of the welfare of the consumers. […] It’s the role of the state,” Coronacion told TomasinoWeb in an exclusive interview.Mariano and Bantay Bigas spokesperson Cathy Estabillo also called for the enactment of laws that will truly support the agriculture of the country such as the House Bill Resolution No. 477 or the Rice Industry Development Act and Genuine Agrarian Reform Bill or the Free Land Distribution Bill.“[At saka] lang magiging competitive ang ating magsasaka kung yung mga pangangailangan nila, yung [kasiguraduhan] dun sa lupang sinasaka nila, subsidized loans, subsidized inputs, at the same time, ay tiyakin na mataas binibili yung palay ng ating mga magsasaka sa pamamagitan ng NFA,” Estabillo said.Build or destroy?“Build-Build-Build” projects of the government, according to Mariano, affect much of the agriculture sector which shrink the agricultural lands in the country.“Paubos nang paubos ang ating agricultural lands. Eh ang agricultural lands lang naman ang klasipikasyon ng lupa sa ating bansa na puwedeng…ireclassify. Eh ‘pag hindi natin pinrotektahan ‘yan mauubos yung agricultural lands natin,” he said.“’Yang mga Build-Build projects na ‘yan na malalaking highways sumasagasa sa ating mga productive agricultural lands. Lalo na yung mga irrigated rice lands natin. Eh dito sa norte meron tayong NLEX, SCTEX, TPLEX… Babagtasin no’n humigit kumulang 400 hectares of productive rice—irrigated rice lands,” Mariano added.Women farmers, affected familiesFor Estabillo, who is also the secretary-general of the national federation of peasant women AMIHAN, the “all-time-low” palay price affect not just the farmers’ livelihood but also displaced women farmers.“‘Yung kababaihang magsasaka marami ang umaalis sa kanilang komunidad para maghanap ng mapagkakakitaan sa mga bayan-bayan kahit na katulong, labandera, nagtitinda-tinda. At saka ang masakit, siyempre, iniiwan nila yung mga anak,” she said.Aside from affecting their families, there is also a possibility of farmers losing their lands due to the continuous deficits in their palay production and livelihood.“Andun din yung tendency na nare-remata yung kanilang mga bukid dahil naisangla [ito] para makakuha ng puhunan, para makapagtanim ng palay. Pero dahil dalawang beses na silang luging-lugi, mas mataas yung porsyento na nareremata at naibebenta na nila yung kanilang mga bukirin,” Estabillo said.“Ang usapin sa pagkain ay usapin ng buong mamamayang Pilipino. […] Sana maging bahagi [tayo] dun sa iba’t ibang kampanyang inilulunsad ng ating mga magsasaka dahil tanging sa pagpapatupad ng tunay na reporma sa lupa maa-attain natin yung kasiguraduhan natin sa pagkain,” she added.Comments Related Topics:AgricultureBigasCynthia VillarfarmersfeaturedPalayRiceRice Liberalization LawRice Tariffication Law You may like PH education: A microcosm of high society “Kantahan sa Lansangan”: Thomasians organize benefit street gig for farmers “Mangarap na dapat ‘yung Pilipinas ay maging para sa Pilipino”—Labor Leader GlitchThe long, rough road of transport problem A study of Japan International Cooperation Agency shows that traffic problem in the country costs around P3.4-billion per day. Many questions, not just about policies to solve these problems but also about urban planning in the country, are being raised because of these. Published 8 months ago on December 4, 2019By TomasinoWeb Photo by Miguel Yap/TomasinoWebThe problem in the country’s mass transportation became more evident in the past months especially during the breakdown and shortened service of LRT-2.An uproar from the public prompted a ‘commute challenge’ performed by the Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo himself in order to refute the claim of ‘transport crisis’ in the country.For Anakbayan National Spokesperson Alex Danday, what the government is doing to alleviate the transport crisis of the nation are just “band-aid solutions.”“Hindi sapat ang ginagawa ng administrasyon dahil wala naman itong ginagawang tunay na reporma sa transportasyon. Ang ginagawa nito ay puro band-aid solutions,” Danday told TomasinoWeb.She added that the four to six hours of commute every day in Metro Manila proves that there is transport crisis in the country.“Pag ang ordinaryong mamamayan ay naggugugol ng malaking bahagi ng oras four to six hours kada araw papunta at pauwi sa arawang commute, ibig sabihin may transport crisis,” Danday said.Danday stressed that asking people to adjust is not a solution but a threat to one’s well-being.“Hindi naman maaari na laging [taong bayan] ang ma-a-adjust at paaga nang paaga ang pag-alis. Hindi ito sustainable, at insinasangkalan ang kalusugan at dignidad ng mamamayan,” she said.Danday also expressed her disapproval of the jeepney modernization which will phaseout thousands of jeepneys in the country because it will strike not just the livelihood of the drivers but also the commute of people. “Ang inaatupag pa ngayon ay ang pagpapalala ng transport crisis sa panukalang jeepney phaseout sa susunod na taon. Isipin natin kung gaano hahaba ang commute ng ordinaryong tao sa oras na tanggalin ang libu-libong jeep at walang kakayahang bumili ng bagong modern jeep worth 2.2 million ang mga driver,” Danday said.She suggested for the government to focus on having an affordable and safe mass-oriented transport system in the country.“[Magtaguyod] ng isang nationalized at mass-oriented transport system. Imbes na magpasa ng polisiya at proyektong naglalayon na paluwagin ang mga kalye para sa mga pribadong sasakyan, dapat unahin ang ligtas at abot-kayang mass transport, isang mass transport system na hindi inuuna ang private profits over public service,” said Danday.READ Thomasians join protest to demand for better, affordable public transportationLack of urban planning or lack of proper implementation?A study of Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) shows that traffic problem in the country costs around P3.4-billion per day and if not solved will increase to around P5.4-billion in 2035.Waze has named Manila to be the ‘worst city to drive’ last September, and Google data says it takes around 5 minutes to drive a kilometer in Metro Manila.Many questions, not just about policies to solve these problems but also about urban planning in the country, are being raised because of these.According to UST College of Architecture Assoc. Professor Leah Dela Rosa, Ph.D. who is also an urban planner and an architect, Metro Manila has urban plans but much were not implemented.“Napakaraming plano, sawang-sawa na ang mga planner kakaplano. Mayroong planning, walang implementation,” Dela Rosa said in an exclusive interview with TomasinoWeb.An example of it was the study conducted by the JICA that was made as a basis for the Metro Manila Dream Plan.The said project has 3 main goals namely: to reduce traffic congestion, to provide urban poor people the affordable housing that is away from hazard and risk, and to protect them from danger caused by natural disasters.Dela Rosa suggests that there should be a participatory planning, in which people will be asked what is needed to be prioritized and developed. She also stated that the government should have a great set of priorities that would help the development of not only Manila but also the cities of rural areas.Furthermore, she affirmed that “urbanization” must not be implemented for there must have a distribution of opportunities all over the country for each province to grow just like Manila.“’Pag sinabi na congestion, ang tanong sino ba ‘yung mga nag co-congest? ‘Yung mga taga-probinsya na nandito, kasi wala silang opportunities [in the province]. But if you open the opportunities outside Manila, mauubos ang tao rito,” Dela Rosa said.It cannot be denied that there is a metro-wide transportation crisis, but the problem, according to her, is not mainly the infrastructures, but the values and attitude of people.“Ang problem kasi ‘yung ugali ng mga Pilipino. Kapag mayroon isang bumili ng kotse, gusto rin ng isa ng kotse. ‘Pag coding, bili pa ng isa. So, it’s a social issue, it’s not just a plan,” Dela Rosa stated.On the other hand, Dela Rosa thinks that the jeepney modernization is a good thing but the government should ensure first that they will provide alternative livelihood for the jeepney drivers who cannot afford the modernized jeepneys that will cost around P1.6-million.“Jeep modernization, why not? Ang tanong papayag ba ang mga driver niyan? Kasi wala silang nakikitang kapalit na matino. Alternative livelihood for those who will be displaced. Hangga’t hindi mo sila binibigyan ng kapalit na trabaho, hindi ‘yan papayag,” Dela Rosa asserted.Privatization of transport utilitiesDela Rosa also believes that privatization must not be implemented because it is the mandate of the government to operate transport utilities and provide cheaper services for the people, and there is still the lack of willingness for accountability.“The government should operate it because it’s the mandate of the government to provide services. Kaya ‘yan ng government, sadyang ayaw lang nila. Kasi maraming externalities, ‘yung corruption and lack of accountability,” Dela Rosa explained.READ Jeepney modernization an "anti-poor" road?Currently, there are three lines of trains in Metro Manila serving more than 12 million people which were neither privately-owned or privately-operated.Ayala Corporation and Metro Pacific Investments Corporation own the LRT-1 while its operations is handled by Light Rail Manila Corporation.The MRT-3 is owned by Metro Rail Transit Corporation while its operations is handled by the Department of TransportationSenator Sherwin Gatchalian suggested for the privatization of LRT- 2 currently run by Light Rail Transit Authority after its service interruption last September and some groups opposed his proposal.Only the Philippine National Railway is owned and operated by the government.For Asst. Prof. Dennis Coronacion, Ph.D, chairperson of UST Political Science Department, the government should regulate the private transportation services providers.“If this is all being handled by the government, ‘yung problems, ‘yung issues regarding coordination, issues regarding masyadong expensive ‘yung pamasahe, all these issues will be solved. Kasi ang after ng government is not of the profit,” Coronacion said in an exclusive interview with TomasinoWeb.He reasoned that private transportation providers do not think much of the welfare of the commuters, unlike the state which has the mandate to serve the people and “look after the welfare of the commuters.”He also added that in other countries like Japan, people arrive on time because public transportation is well-organized: “May coordination kasi ‘yung oras ng biyahe ng mga trains nila.” Hence, for Professor Coronacion, state regulation with the affairs of private corporations would serve as a solution to the country’s unorganized transport system.“‘Pag walang state intervention diyan, walang pakialam ang mga ano, they will set prices at very high. Wala, kawawa naman ‘yung mga [tao],” he said.On the contrary, Coronacion reminded that government meddling with the transport providers of the country is not an absolute flaw-free solution. “The assumption there is that ‘pag nagtayo ka ng government office to regulate, titino sila. Actually, hindi kasi there’s corruption. There’s corruption tapos there’s the weakness of the institution,” he asserted.“Kasi I’m quite sure sa majority ng mga industries na ‘yan, merong mga government offices to regulate. But the question is it functioning well? Is it serving the interest of the public? […] Meron namang mechanisms to regulate but they are not functioning well,” Coronacion added. A. Rosario and C. BautistaComments Continue ReadingGlitchJeepney modernization an “anti-poor” road? Transport group PISTON said they do not oppose modernization, but the current framework of the jeepney modernization program is “anti-poor” and only benefits large companies and businesses. Published 2 years ago on March 19, 2018By Philip Jamilla Photo by Genelaine Urbano/TomasinoWeb.The University once again suspended classes and office work in anticipation of today’s transport strike against the Department of Transportation (DOTr)’s jeepney modernization program.Today’s strike marks the first for the year, and the third against the program since it was launched by the DOTr June last year.Despite the protests, the wheels of the modernization program—which has been proposed since 2016—are already in motion as the government already began rolling out the “more convenient, more comfortable, and environment-friendly” units last January.Along with replacing the ubiquitous jeepney with around 180,000 units by 2020, changes in the public transport franchising system, routes and training for drivers are also eyed by the program.While commuter groups have lauded the DOTr’s proposals for the program as necessary, long overdue and beneficial for the safety of commuters, transport groups such as Pinagkaisang Samahan ng Tsuper at Operator Nationwide (PISTON) and No to Jeepney Phaseout Coalition continue to resist the implementation of the program.Why then are transport groups opposing modernization program? “Anti-poor”, loss of livelihood, higher faresOne of the main points of the jeepney modernization program is the phaseout of at least 15-year-old units starting this year as part of a three-year transition period.Old units would be replaced with Euro 4-compliant engines or solar-powered engines in order to minimize carbon monoxide emissions and smoke belching.Most jeepney units are powered by Euro 2-compliant engines.The DOTr also proposed to outfit the new units with additional features such as dashboard cameras, Wi-Fi internet connection, speed limiters, global position system trackers, closed-circuit television cameras and an automated fare collection system powered by the Ayala Corporation-owned Beep, among others.PISTON National President George San Mateo insisted that they are not against modernizing jeepneys for the safety of commuters and environmental concerns.With the additional features and the forced phaseout of old units, however, PISTON decried the framework of the program as “anti-poor” and a “massacre” of the livelihood of drivers.The transport group said the program would lead to loss of jobs or higher fares since jeepney drivers and operators would not be able to afford the price of the new units, which are estimated to cost around P1.2 to P1.6 million per unit.The group also claimed that the price per unit could still go higher.“Pero dahil idadaan ito sa negosyong scheme ng gobyernong Duterte ay aabot sa lagpas dalawang milyong piso ang magiging halaga ng bawat unit,” PISTON said in a statement November last year.In the same statement, they also said that drivers would have to pay more than P800 every day for seven years for the new units.Jeepney drivers only earn an average of P300 to P500 take home pay after 10 hours of daily driving.In a joint statement with the Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board (LTFRB), the DOTr refuted PISTON’s claims that the program is “anti-poor” and criticized the group as “misinformed” as they cited the low equity and interests rates of the Department of Finance’s financial loan and subsidy scheme to help drivers pay for the new units.“A major component of the [program] is the financial scheme available to PUJ operators and drivers who wish to avail of new units through financing of government financial institutions, Development Bank of the Philippines and Land Bank of the Philippines,” the DOTr and the LTFRB said.They also said that the government would offer as high as P80,000 subsidy per unit to cover the equity payment.Meanwhile, President Rodrigo Duterte scoffed at PISTON’s protests , saying: “Mahirap kayo? Putang ina, magtiis kayo sa hirap at gutom, wala akong pakialam. It’s the majority of the Filipino people. Huwag ninyo ipasubo ang tao.” “Neoliberal” policies, monopoly controlFor PISTON and other militant groups, the issue of the jeepney modernization program goes beyond the capability of drivers and operators to pay for the new units.“Neoliberal” policies in the program would lead to the monopolization of the transport sector and would only benefit foreign companies and big businesses, the groups said.“Ang mga programang pangtransportasyon ng rehimeng US-Duterte ay nakabalangkas sa neoliberalismo na pawang anti-mahihirap at makadayuhan. Nakasandal ang programang jeepney phaseout sa pamumuhunan ng mga dayuhang korporasyon tulad ng Toyota, Chrysler, Nissan, at Mitsubishi na magpapatupad ng monopolyong kontrol sa transportasyon,” PISTON said.The DOTr, however, said local manufacturers such as Francisco Motors would design and produce the new units, but other transport groups such as Pasang Masda and Federation of Jeepney Operators and Drivers Association of the Philippines have expressed intentions to buy cheaper units from China.PISTON feared that such actions would lead the government to be more inclined to work with and incentivize multinational car manufacturers instead of local manufacturers.Furthermore, the group also raised flags on the LTFRB’s Omnibus Franchising Guidelines (OBF)—which goes hand in hand with the modernization program—as it would force certain franchises to merge and encourage franchises to form cooperatives for easier regulation within the three-year transition period.Complying with the OBF is also a prerequisite for franchises to acquire at least 10 modernized jeepney units offered at P1.4 million each for the modernization program; LTFRB’s fleet management program set a minimum of 10 units for franchises to be accredited.Bayan Muna Rep. Carlos Isagani Zarate slammed the fleet management program and the modernization program in House Resolution No. 833, saying that jeepney drivers and operators would be “effectively forced to surrender management of their own jeepneys to a fleet management corporation.”Zarate further said that the modernization program “is simply a corporate takeover of the [public utility jeep] sector that would not only result to massive loss of livelihood of our transport workers, but would also severely affect the public since PUJ is still the most availed of public transport system.”PISTON also opposed the OBF, as they stated that “kalakhan ng mga operator ang nanganganib mawalan ng prangkisa at jeepney na hahantong sa Scrappage Program sa pangunguna ng LTFRB.” Nationalized mass transport systemInstead of the current program, PISTON called on the government to junk the program in favor of nationalizing the mass transport system, rather than allowing private companies to take over franchises“Kaya’t ang kailagan ng mga tsuper, opereytor, at komyuter ay nasyunalisado na pampublikong transportasyon,” PISTON said.The group likened the framework and policies of the current program to former President Benigno Aquino III’s public-private partnership program, which placed line 1 of the Light Rail Transit system under the management of Metro Pacific Investments Corporation and Ayala Corporation.Both corporations have also expressed intentions to take over the operations of the Metro Rail Transport system.According to PISTON, nationalizing the transport system would lead to better government subsidies and more control on franchises, and thus cheaper fares and efficient “mass-oriented” transportation.Bagong Alyansang Makabayan also urged the government to invest in a state-owned mass transport system and push for an industrialized economy so that the country could manufacture its own units and thus create more jobs for drivers as well as workers in the manufacturing sector.They also expressed support for collective or cooperative ownership of the mass transport system in the country instead of “corporatization.”However, the DOTr remained firm in their decision to fully implement the modernization program. In response, PISTON said that they would hold bigger and longer strikes.“At kung hindi makikinig si Duterte sa ating mga hinaing, asahang mas matagalan at malawak na pambasang tigil-pasada at protestang bayan ang ilulunsad ng ga drayber, opereytor, at komyuter, buwan-buwan kung kinakailangan,” the group stated.Comments Continue ReadingGlitchDuterte regime an epidemic of “macho-fascist” misogyny? As feminist groups celebrated International Women’s Day, they also slammed President Rodrigo Duterte’s various sexist remarks, saying that they encourage state-endorsed violence against women. Published 2 years ago on March 9, 2018By Philip Jamilla Photo by Elizabeth Nicole Regudo/TomasinoWeb.President Rodrigo Duterte’s critics have long derided his unfiltered tongue, but for his staunch supporters, his language shows that he is one of them.Unlike previous presidents, Duterte likes to go off-script during official speeches: He code-switches and cusses in press conferences, and he often engages his audiences with banter involving vulgar tirades against “yellows,” “destabilizers” and, more often than not, jokes about women.These jokes are usually met with laughter from his audience: An early example of this was Duterte’s infamous “dapat ang mayor muna ang nauna” remark regarding the rape and murder of Australian lay missioner Jaqueline Hamill in Davao City in 1989.While he subsequently apologized for his joke, Duterte has proceeded to admit to being a womanizer, ogled Vice President Leni Robredo’s legs with Finance Secretary Carlos Dominguez during a cabinet meeting, threatened to expose Sen. Leila De Lima’s alleged sex video, whistled at broadcast reporter Mariz Umali during a press conference in Davao City, and joked about using 42 virgins to promote tourism in the country within his two years in office.Duterte even made another rape joke as he addressed military troops in Iligan City May last year in light of possible cases of human rights violations under Mindanao’s martial law.“Ako na magpakulong sa inyo. ‘Pag naka-rape ka ng tatlo, aminin ko na akin ‘yun,” the President said.Despite the rise of various #MeToo campaigns in various parts of the globe, feminist and women’s groups said they have found it difficult for a similar movement to take root in the country, as Duterte’s remarks about women continues to perpetuate misogyny, and that his recent statement about shooting female New People’s Army (NPA) cadres in their vaginas normalizes systemic violence against women.Last month, Duterte recounted before 200 NPA surrenderees his orders to military troops: “Order bag-o ni mayor: ‘Di lang daw mo patyon. Pusilon lang mo sa bisong arong. Og wa na ma’y bisong, wa na ma’y silbi (Mayor’s new orders: Don’t kill them. Just shoot them in the vagina. Without their vagina, they’re useless).”Prompted by his remarks, Sen. Risa Hontiveros declared a “sexism outbreak” under the Duterte regime on Monday, which she stated was reinforced by the President’s “numerous anti-women statements.”“We are witnessing an outbreak of sexism and misogyny under this two-year old administration. In all three branches of the government, we are seeing an epidemic of sexism that is state-sponsored, brazen and relentless,” Hontiveros said in a press release.In their statement for International Women’s Day, World March of Women – Philippines likewise condemned Duterte’s statement, saying that “violence against women is a policy of the Duterte administration.”They also cited the incarceration of De Lima, the impeachment of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, and the repeated threats on Rappler’s Maria Ressa and Pia Ranada as a way for Duterte “to control and punish women” through “disempowering women in government positions and in media who refuse to be cowed and are critical of the president’s actions and policies.”Gabriela Women’s Party Rep. Emmi de Jesus slammed Duterte’s orders as “[taking] state terrorism against women and the people to a whole new level,” calling him a “macho-fascist.”“[Duterte’s] latest nasty remark openly encourages violence against women, contributes to the impunity on such, and further confirms himself as the most dangerous macho-fascist in the government right now. He has further presented himself as the epitome of misogyny and fascism terribly rolled in one,” de Jesus stated.Gabriela led thousands in their annual protest march from Liwasang Bonifacio to Mendiola yesterday afternoon, despite being denied a rally permit by the Manila Police District. They also demanded social and economic reforms for women farmers and laborers, as well as justice for female victims of the government’s drug and military counterinsurgency operations, among others.Human Rights Watch (HRW) also decried the President’s statement as a violation of international humanitarian law.“It encourages state forces to commit sexual violence during armed conflict which is a violation of international humanitarian law,” HRW Asia Division Philippines Researcher Carlos Conde said.The outrage, however, was met with rolling eyes by the Malacañang as it repeatedly pleaded the public not to take the President’s jokes seriously.Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque, a former human rights lawyer who defended World War II comfort women and slain transgender woman Jennifer Laude, told feminists that they “are sometimes OA” or over-acting and urged them to “just laugh” at the President’s jokes.Furthermore, Roque also encouraged the public to look at Duterte’s actions rather than his worlds—a common response from Duterte’s supporters—as they cite Davao City’s Women Development Code, or Davao City Ordinance No. 5004, which Duterte signed in 1997 during his term as mayor of Davao City, as well as the signing of Executive Order No. 12, which seeks the full and strict implementation of the Reproductive Health Law, as proof of his pro-women stance.Nonetheless, Hontiveros believed that “Duterte’s sexist comments carry weight” and that “language is a powerful where sexism, gender discrimination and even violence against women are committed and replicated.”“They are not innocent words. His sexist pronouncements have set into motion vicious attacks against women, particularly those perceived to be critics of this administration,” she continued.Comments Continue ReadingLatestPopularVideos Blogs6 days agoJuly 2020: A great storm of misplaced priorities Features7 days agoWalking in unity for this year’s #SONAgkaisa Opinion1 week agoI challenge you to scrutinize Peripheral1 week agoCHR, Church opposes Duterte’s call to revive death penalty News1 week ago‘Duterte regime falls deaf to people’s cries’ –CSC, LSCs Blogs6 days agoJuly 2020: A great storm of misplaced priorities Blogs1 week ago10 tweets summing-up this year’s SONA Literary1 week agoAng pulso ng binibigkas News1 week ago‘Duterte regime falls deaf to people’s cries’ –CSC, LSCs Talk on the Web1 week ago#SONA2020: Netizens react to this year’s state of the nation address Videos2 years agoUST UAAP Season 81 Videos2 years agoGraduating Thomasians answer what they will miss in UST Live2 years agoLIVE: Tagisan 2018 Videos3 years agoTraslacion 2018 Videos3 years agoNational Day of Protest Facebook Trending Blogs6 days agoJuly 2020: A great storm of misplaced priorities News2 weeks agoTake part in SONA protest, student council presidents urge Blogs2 weeks agoThe allegory of Alyx Arumpac’s “Aswang” Blogs2 weeks agoHow well do you know your rights?